8 September 2026גלובס – משפט

High Court Invalidates Second Authority Council Appointments

The Supreme Court has disqualified the appointment of Dr. Ifat Ben-Hai Segev as Chair of the Second Authority, along with members Kinneret Barashi and Dr. Haim Shine, citing a conflict of interest.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at גלובס – משפט

Why it matters

The ruling underscores the strict duty of public officials to adhere to conflict-of-interest agreements and establishes clear boundaries on how legal proceedings influence appointments to regulatory bodies.

Key points

  • ▪The High Court invalidated the appointment of Dr. Ifat Ben-Hai Segev as Chair of the Second Authority Council.
  • ▪The primary reason for the disqualification is the Prime Minister's breach of a conflict-of-interest agreement due to Ben-Hai Segev's status as a witness in his trial.
  • ▪The court's decision also includes the disqualification of Adv. Kinneret Barashi and Dr. Haim Shine as council members.
  • ▪The court ordered the nullification of government decisions regarding the council's composition.
  • ▪The case was remanded to the Appointments Advisory Committee for a re-examination of all Second Authority Council members.

In a dramatic ruling issued recently, the High Court of Justice intervened in the appointment process of the Second Authority for Television and Radio Council. According to a report by Globes, the Supreme Court ordered the invalidation of government decisions regarding the appointments of several senior figures within this body. At the heart of the ruling is the disqualification of Dr. Ifat Ben-Hai Segev from the position of Council Chair. The justices determined that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu acted in breach of his binding conflict-of-interest agreement, given that Dr.

Ben-Hai Segev is listed as a witness in the criminal trial pending against him. The status of the appointee as a witness in the legal case of the appointing official created a situation where the action was taken under a fundamental conflict-of-interest flaw. Beyond the chair's appointment, the court also disqualified the tenure of Adv. Kinneret Barashi and Dr. Haim Shine as council members. Under the decision, the High Court ordered the nullification of the government decisions that approved these appointments, stipulating that the matter of all Second Authority Council members must be returned for a rigorous re-examination by the Appointments Advisory Committee.

This ruling emphasizes the elected echelon's commitment to strict compliance with conflict-of-interest arrangements, particularly regarding appointments to regulatory bodies with broad public influence. The practical consequence of the verdict is an immediate cessation of the current composition's activity and a mandate for the government to subject its candidates to renewed scrutiny by the professional committee, while fully accounting for the legal constraints established in the judgment.

This decision may impact the appointment of senior public officials in general, and the interface between personal legal proceedings and the Prime Minister’s administrative actions in particular.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile