8 October 2026ynet – RSS חדשות בסינון משפטי

District Court Convicts MK Ofer Cassif of Assaulting a Police Officer

The Jerusalem District Court has convicted Member of Knesset (MK) Ofer Cassif of assaulting a police officer under aggravating circumstances. The conviction concerns an incident during a May 2022 protest in the South Hebron Hills. The court rejected Cassif's claims of self-defense and ruled his actions are not protected by parliamentary immunity.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at ynet – RSS חדשות בסינון משפטי

Why it matters

The ruling clarifies the boundaries of parliamentary immunity in relation to criminal assault offenses. The decision is significant due to the court's determination that violent behavior toward law enforcement officials is not protected under the official duties of a member of the Knesset.

Key points

  • ▪The District Court convicted MK Ofer Cassif of assaulting a police officer under aggravating circumstances.
  • ▪The incident took place in May 2022 during a protest in the South Hebron Hills.
  • ▪The court rejected Cassif's self-defense claim after reviewing evidence and on-site footage.
  • ▪The judge ruled that the actions are not covered by a Knesset member's substantive immunity.
  • ▪The defendant responded by characterizing the proceedings as political persecution.

The Jerusalem District Court has issued its verdict in the case of Member of Knesset Ofer Cassif, finding him guilty of assaulting a police officer under aggravating circumstances. The conviction comes approximately four years after the incident, which occurred during a demonstration in the South Hebron Hills in May 2022. According to the facts detailed in the indictment and the verdict, the incident began following an argument between Cassif and officers on-site, who prevented him from proceeding with his vehicle toward the demonstration area for security and public order reasons.

According to facts presented to the court, after a verbal altercation, Cassif reversed and then drove his vehicle toward a policeman standing in his path until the car hit the officer’s leg. It was further alleged that Cassif then exited the vehicle and struck the officer on the head. The Jerusalem District Attorney's Office argued that these were deliberate acts intended to obstruct a police officer in the performance of his duties. Conversely, MK Cassif argued during the trial that the collision with the vehicle was accidental and that the strike to the officer’s head was an instinctive reaction performed in self-defense.

The court examined the evidence, including visual documentation and field testimonies, and determined that Cassif's version was inconsistent with the findings. Judge Elazar Bialin emphasized in the ruling the nature of Cassif’s conduct during the incident, noting that the defendant addressed the officers with harsh and offensive language, including verbal abuse. The ruling explicitly stated that the acts attributed to the MK are not covered by the substantive immunity granted to Knesset members and that there is no basis for the self-defense claim.

Following the publication of the verdict, MK Cassif responded, claiming this is a continuation of political persecution directed against him and the political camp he represents, while criticizing the legal background of some of the parties involved in the system. This decision represents a significant milestone in the prolonged legal process initiated following the incident.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile