29 September 2026ICE – משפט

Class Action Request Against 'Yedidim': Communications Law Breach?

Yedidim, an organization with tens of thousands of volunteers, faces a NIS 2.5 million class action claim alleging unsolicited messages. The organization warns of service disruption, while the petitioner asserts he is upholding the law.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at ICE – משפט

Why it matters

The case raises fundamental questions regarding the tension between enforcing the Communications Law and the viability of social organizations relying on donations, highlighting the legal complexity of NGO data management.

Key points

  • ▪A NIS 2.5 million class action motion was filed against Yedidim.
  • ▪The petitioner alleges donation requests were sent without consent, violating the Communications Law.
  • ▪Yedidim warns that significant financial liability could impair its roadside assistance services.
  • ▪The petitioner previously filed a similar claim that was settled in 2022.
  • ▪The petitioner claims he attempted to resolve the matter with the CEO before resorting to litigation.

Yedidim Roadside Assistance, operating for over 15 years with roughly 65,000 volunteers providing free roadside aid, faces complex legal proceedings. As reported by Yair Altman on Channel 14, a motion for certification of a class action has been filed against the organization for an estimated NIS 2. 5 million. The core cause of action, as alleged by petitioner Amit Worgaft, concerns the sending of donation requests without recipient consent, which he claims violates the Communications Law.

The organization denies the allegations, noting that such proceedings could harm its vital operations for the Israeli public. The legal debate raises complex issues regarding how organizations operate in the digital space and their duty to comply with messaging regulations. It should be noted that this is merely a motion to certify a class action, and no judicial decision has yet confirmed it or determined that the organization violated the law. A point of public interest is that Worgaft previously sought help from the organization.

Similar to the current proceedings, Worgaft previously litigated against the organization in 2022, resulting in a settlement and NIS 1,000 compensation. Supporters and volunteers have expressed opposition to what they characterize as a repetitive process. Simultaneously, a public movement of drivers, led by former MK Abir Kara, has emerged to protest the lawsuit. Conversely, the petitioner maintains the claims target the method of mass messaging rather than the volunteers themselves.

It was also noted that prior to litigation, the petitioner attempted to resolve the issue via a meeting with the CEO and a warning letter. His primary argument is that a good cause does not permit violations of the law. For drivers, this case highlights the dilemma between privacy law enforcement and the importance of such social organizations. The case demonstrates the complexity social organizations face when using digital fundraising mechanisms under strict communications regulations, with any ruling likely impacting future conduct of similar entities.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile