21 August 2026ICE – משפט

Class Action Filed Against Wolt Over Price-Controlled Product Sales

A class action motion was filed against Wolt in the Haifa District Court, alleging the platform allows the sale of price-controlled food products above legal limits, causing an estimated 2.5 million NIS in damages. Wolt rejects the claims, stating businesses are responsible for pricing.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at ICE – משפט

Why it matters

The lawsuit raises fundamental questions about the legal liability of delivery platforms for prices set by businesses, potentially impacting the business model of food and delivery companies in Israel.

Key points

  • ▪A class action motion was filed against Wolt for allegedly selling price-controlled products at excessive prices.
  • ▪The damages to the public are estimated in the claim at approximately 2.5 million NIS.
  • ▪The plaintiff argues that Wolt's involvement in the sales process obligates it to monitor prices.
  • ▪Wolt claims the lawsuit is meritless and that local businesses set their own prices.
  • ▪The case was filed at the Haifa District Court and has not yet been ruled upon.

A motion to certify a class action has been filed this week in the Haifa District Court against Wolt Enterprises Israel Ltd. The lawsuit, filed by Aharon Amarbi through attorneys Elran Shapira Bar-Or and Michael Adler, alleges the sale of government-controlled food products at prices exceeding the statutory maximum. According to the motion, the damage to consumers is estimated at approximately 2.5 million NIS. The plaintiff provided examples, such as 3% Tnuva milk sold for 17.1 NIS against a controlled price of 14.7 NIS, and a 30-egg carton sold at a grocery store in the Sharon area for 60 NIS, compared to a controlled price of about 35.6 NIS.

The applicant's central claim is that Wolt acts as more than a technological intermediary between customers and businesses, asserting it is substantively involved in the sales process. He argues this involvement is evidenced by the issuance of invoices to customers, provision of customer service, and the collection of commission fees from businesses, which reportedly can reach up to 30%. To support the argument that the company is aware of its legal obligations, the motion notes that 'Wolt Market'—a store chain owned by the company—strictly adheres to maximum pricing. The applicant demands that the court order the company to monitor prices of controlled products on the platform and compensate consumers allegedly overcharged.

In response, Wolt stated the lawsuit is frivolous. The company claims that the businesses operating on the application are solely responsible for determining product variety and prices. Wolt emphasized that it operates in accordance with the law and requested the dismissal of the claim. This is a preliminary legal proceeding that has not yet been heard by the court; thus, the allegations have not been adjudicated. For businesses and consumers, the issue raises significant questions regarding the legal liability of delivery platforms in transactions where price discrepancies exist between the seller and the platform, as well as the boundary between technological mediation and active involvement in the final consumer price. The issue of price control in digital supply chains is expected to continue engaging courts as the use of food and essential goods delivery applications grows.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile