2 October 2026N12 – חדשות

High Court Drama: Ra'am and Joint List Cleared; Abu Shehadeh Withdraws

The Supreme Court overturned Central Elections Committee decisions, clearing Ra'am and the Joint List for the 26th Knesset. Ofer Cassif was cleared by a majority, while Sami Abu Shehadeh withdrew after judicial criticism.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at N12 – חדשות

Why it matters

The ruling sets clear boundaries for invoking the disqualification clause for MKs and lists, while preserving the delicate balance between state security and the democratic right to vote and be elected.

Key points

  • ▪The High Court unanimously overturned the disqualification of the Ra'am and Joint List parties.
  • ▪MK Ofer Cassif was cleared to run by a seven-to-two majority.
  • ▪Sami Abu Shehadeh withdrew from the race following sharp judicial criticism of his statements.
  • ▪President Yitzhak Amit warned that extensive use of disqualification powers could harm democratic values.
  • ▪The Court established that criteria for disqualification remain narrow and limited to extreme cases only.

An expanded panel of nine Supreme Court justices, led by President Yitzhak Amit, has delivered its ruling on the disqualification of candidates and lists for the 26th Knesset elections. In a unanimous decision, the High Court overturned the Central Elections Committee's ruling to disqualify the Ra'am and Joint List parties. The justices emphasized that the evidence presented to the committee did not meet the evidentiary threshold required for invoking Section 7A of the Basic Law: The Knesset.

Additionally, by a majority of seven to two, the candidacy of MK Ofer Cassif was approved, despite the judges' sharp reservations regarding his statements, which they described as repulsive. Justices David Mintz and Alex Stein opined that Cassif should have been disqualified due to support for armed struggle.

The dramatic focus of the hearing centered on the candidacy of Balad chairman, Sami Abu Shehadeh. According to N12 reports, the justices sharply criticized an article he published following the events of October 7. President Amit noted during the hearing that there was a consensus among the panel members that the remarks were painful and nauseating. Faced with clear indications from the judges that a disqualification was imminent, Abu Shehadeh announced the withdrawal of his candidacy, effectively ending the legal proceeding against him.

At the start of the hearings, President Amit emphasized the importance of the right to vote and be elected, noting that the power of disqualification is a double-edged sword, and that its broad application could damage democratic values. Outside the courtroom, verbal confrontations occurred between protesters and the Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who represented his party's position calling for the disqualification. The Balad party stated that Abu Shehadeh's withdrawal does not constitute a retreat from its positions, but rather a response to the legal reality that developed in the Supreme Court.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile