An opinion piece by Abir Kara, published in Globes in early October 2026, has renewed public and legal debate regarding the use of class action lawsuits against charitable and aid organizations. Central to the argument is a major lawsuit filed against the 'Yedidim' organization, involving the transmission of a single SMS message. According to the author, the case illustrates the gap between the original purpose of the Class Action Law—protecting consumers and preventing widespread harm—and its actual application in certain instances.
The piece describes a situation where social organizations, whose work relies on public aid, are forced to face significant compensation demands originating from legal proceedings initiated by individuals characterized in the column as 'serial plaintiffs.' According to the viewpoint presented, pursuing such proceedings against organizations working for the public good may erode their ability to continue their vital activities. The author notes that the current legal reality allows for a misuse of this legal tool that is inconsistent with the spirit of the law.
In this context, the column suggests that a legislative amendment could be an effective solution to prevent the abuse of this process. The proposed legislation aims to restore the appropriate balance to the system, ensuring that class actions continue to fulfill their role as a social and consumer gatekeeper without becoming an overwhelming burden on non-profit entities. The practical implication for these organizations is a need to reconsider how they handle communication and privacy regulations, as minor administrative errors can lead to wide-ranging financial claims. The author emphasizes the importance of precision in complying with legal requirements while striving to prevent frivolous lawsuits. The legal discourse on this issue continues as the writer calls for a conceptual and legislative change to protect civil society organizations from what he describes as the improper use of this legal tool.