2 September 2026TheMarker – חדשות משפט וכלכלה

Former Minister Shalom Simhon Ordered to Pay Damages for Defamation

The Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court ruled against former minister and Pasta Rico chairman, Shalom Simhon, ordering him to pay 30,000 NIS to company founders Gil Ben Dov and Shay Alon for defamatory statements made in an internal email.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at TheMarker – חדשות משפט וכלכלה

Why it matters

The ruling demonstrates that internal organizational communication is not immune to defamation claims and highlights the personal risk associated with sharp rhetoric from high-level officials against colleagues or management partners.

Key points

  • ▪The Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court rejected the position of Shalom Simhon in a defamation lawsuit.
  • ▪Simhon was ordered to pay 20,000 NIS in damages to Pasta Rico founders Gil Ben Dov and Shay Alon.
  • ▪The lawsuit was filed over the content of an internal email written by Simhon regarding a CFO's resignation.
  • ▪In addition to damages, Simhon was ordered to pay 10,000 NIS in legal expenses.
  • ▪The proceedings emphasize the responsibility held by officials in drafting internal corporate communications.

The Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court recently issued a ruling in a defamation lawsuit filed by the founders of Doro Italian Products, known as Pasta Rico, against the company’s chairman, former minister Shalom Simhon. According to a report by Omer Tamri Leon in TheMarker, Judge Nurit Tabiv Mizrahi determined that Simhon must pay 20,000 NIS in damages to the founders, Gil Ben Dov and Shay Alon, in addition to 10,000 NIS in legal costs.

The lawsuit stemmed from an internal email circulated by Simhon regarding the resignation of the company’s CFO, shortly after he assumed the role. In the email, Simhon claimed that the founders were acting in a manner that drove away highly experienced individuals and alleged that the two intimidated the company's accountant. The founders viewed these statements as a smear on their professional reputations and subsequently filed the defamation suit.

In her ruling, the judge accepted the plaintiffs' position, concluding that Simhon’s remarks constituted defamation. This legal proceeding highlights the sensitivity inherent in top-level management ranks, especially within subsidiaries of large corporations such as Tnuva. The ruling underscores the importance of careful phrasing in internal organizational communication, even when the dialogue is not intended for the general public. The fact that the correspondence was internal did not shield Simhon, as the law does not necessarily distinguish between public and limited distribution when statements may cause damage to an individual's reputation. The court's decision emphasizes that senior officials must exercise extreme caution when criticizing colleagues or partners, as using language that harms professional standing without sufficient factual basis can lead to significant financial liability. This case serves as a reminder for directors and managers to carefully consider the content of their documents and emails, as these can serve as concrete evidence in civil litigation, even within internal corporate contexts.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile