The Central Election Committee has dismissed a petition concerning the participation of Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir in a state event marking the 50th anniversary of the Israel Police volunteer system. As reported by ynet, Committee Chairman Justice Noam Sohlberg ruled that the Minister may attend and speak at the ceremony, based on a formal commitment—submitted as an affidavit—not to use the occasion for election propaganda. Justice Sohlberg clarified in his ruling that the prohibition against election propaganda in public assets and state events applies to all parties without exception, and the Minister is obligated to adhere strictly to the law in this regard. In this context, the judge noted it would be prudent for the Minister to submit the draft of his speech for legal review, although he clarified this was a recommendation rather than a binding order.
The position of Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara was starkly different. She expressed opposition to the Minister appearing on stage at an event produced and funded by the Israel Police, fearing it would be illicitly exploited for political propaganda associated with the Minister's public achievements. Conversely, Minister Ben-Gvir attacked the Attorney General’s position, arguing it was another attempt to prevent him from exercising his duties, while emphasizing the importance of recognizing the volunteers who served under his ministry. The affair once again brings to the agenda the tension between the political echelon and legal advisors regarding the thin line between legitimate public activity and prohibited election propaganda. In the past, Justice Sohlberg has addressed similar issues regarding Minister Ben-Gvir’s conduct, including an order to delete social media videos where it was found that the Minister made improper use of public assets for campaign purposes. While this decision allows the Minister's participation, it serves as a reminder that the use of government resources or official events for political ends is subject to strict judicial scrutiny and requires rigorous compliance with election laws, especially during times of heightened political sensitivity. The event underscores for public officials and elected representatives the need for a sharp distinction between the professional activity of a government ministry and the glorification of those at its helm ahead of election cycles.