14 August 2026N12 – חדשות

Binyahu Razi Murder Case: Police Investigation Details Released

Police have disclosed details from the murder investigation of the late Binyahu Razi, who was stabbed to death in an Airbnb apartment. Evidence suggests premeditation and weapon procurement by the involved parties, including young women and minors. Defense attorneys assert self-defense and reject the charges in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at N12 – חדשות

Why it matters

The case raises social and legal questions regarding youth violence and the importance of proving 'premeditation' in criminal proceedings, a matter with significant impact on verdicts in murder cases.

Key points

  • ▪The late Binyahu Razi was stabbed to death in a Jerusalem Airbnb, according to the indictment.
  • ▪Police allege premeditation and the procurement of weapons by the group.
  • ▪Defense attorneys argue self-defense and reject allegations of murder planning.
  • ▪The investigation revealed the involvement of young women and minors, and their role in obstructing the investigation.
  • ▪The trial is in its early stages and the claims have yet to be adjudicated by the court.

The murder case of the late Binyahu Razi, a 19-year-old from Givat Ze'ev, continues to generate public interest as further details from police investigators regarding the events leading to his death emerge. The incident, which took place about a month ago in an Airbnb apartment in Jerusalem, is currently at the center of a complex legal process. Police investigators have described a framework of premeditated planning and the involvement of several suspects, including young women and minors.

According to information reported by N12, Chief Superintendent Rotem Hila Zaken, who is in charge of the investigation, stated that the findings indicate premeditation preceded the assault. The indictment alleges that the participants armed themselves with items such as knives, clubs, and a hammer, following claims of violence initiated by the victim and his friend. The investigation revealed that some of the participants watched the attack in real-time via video call, indicating awareness of the events unfolding at the scene.

Chief Inspector Oren Nagar, head of the investigation team at the Zion District's Crimes Unit, emphasizes that the suspects, most of whom are minors, did not show remorse during interrogations and displayed behavior inconsistent with the gravity of the alleged acts. Police have accused some of the individuals involved, including the mother of one of the youths, of attempting to obstruct the investigation and assisting suspects in fleeing the scene.

Legally, defense counsel are presenting versions contrary to the Prosecution's position. Attorney Moshe Yochai, representing the primary suspect Avior Sasson, argues that it is impossible to determine with certainty who carried out the fatal stabbing and that the incident was an act of self-defense due to fear for the lives of those involved following prior violence. Conversely, Attorney Omri Stern, representing Agam Tsarfi, rejects allegations of a premeditated murder, noting that she is a young woman with no criminal record who was involved in a complex relationship. On the other hand, Attorney Yossi Lazar, representing Matanya, who witnessed the attack, emphasizes that the act was committed in cold blood and looks forward to justice being served against the defendants.

It is important to clarify that these are claims appearing in the indictment and the statements of the parties within the criminal proceeding. The practical significance for readers lies in understanding the severity of potential sentencing for youth violence offenses and the emphasis police place on proving premeditation and criminal intent—elements at the heart of the current legal debate in this case.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile