6 October 2026חדשות 13 – חדשות

Supreme Court Suggests 'The Democrats' Withdraw Plea on Golan Security

The Supreme Court heard a petition regarding the Shin Bet's decision not to provide security for Yair Golan, Chair of 'The Democrats'. Chief Justice Yitzhak Amit suggested the party withdraw the plea, stating the court would not interfere with professional security assessments.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at חדשות 13 – חדשות

Why it matters

The Supreme Court discussion highlights issues regarding security assessments for politicians and the nexus between threat levels and political rights. The suggestion to withdraw the petition reflects the court's caution in intervening in professional security decisions.

Key points

  • ▪The Supreme Court heard a petition regarding the security of 'The Democrats' Chair, Yair Golan.
  • ▪The Chief Justice suggested the party withdraw the petition.
  • ▪Justice Amit stated the agency is a professional body and the court would not intervene.
  • ▪The party representative argued that the proposed solution hinders the election campaign.
  • ▪The petition was filed following the Shin Bet's decision not to provide security despite threats.
  • ▪Police had reportedly classified the threat level against Golan as high.

The Supreme Court heard a petition filed by 'The Democrats' party regarding the Israel Security Agency's (Shin Bet) decision not to provide security to the party's chair, Maj. Gen. (Res. ) Yair Golan. At the end of an ex parte hearing attended by Shin Bet representatives, Chief Justice Yitzhak Amit suggested the party representative withdraw the petition. "We have a professional body whose expertise is in this matter, and we will not interfere," Justice Amit explained.

He noted that while the issue raised is significant, the agency conducts ongoing personal security activities and can assist the party in coordinating with the police for specific events. The representative for 'The Democrats' replied that the proposed solution does not allow the party to conduct an election campaign. The petition was filed following the decision of the advisory political committee not to recommend security for Golan, and the subsequent referral of the decision to the Ministerial Committee for Shin Bet Affairs, which placed the matter under the responsibility of the Shin Bet Director.

The party petitioned against the Shin Bet Director, the Ministerial Committee, and the Government of Israel, arguing that the threat level against Golan was defined by the police as high (4 out of 6), and the petition included examples of severe threats against his life. Following the filing of the petition, the Supreme Court had previously ordered the Shin Bet Director, the committee, and the government to reconsider the need for Golan's security based on the current threat assessment and to update the court.

According to reports, the Shin Bet stated it would remain a "professional body" dealing with the matter. It should be noted that no further details were provided regarding the threat assessment or the final decision.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile