5 October 2026גלובס – משפט

Ruling on Damages in Efi Naveh Privacy Infringement Case

A court has ruled on the distribution of liability for the 450,000 NIS in damages awarded to Adv. Efi Naveh for privacy violations. The judgment mandates that journalist Hadas Shteif and Galey Tzahal are jointly and severally liable, raising questions regarding personal versus institutional accountability.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at גלובס – משפט

Why it matters

The ruling emphasizes the complexity of legal liability in privacy infringement torts, clarifying that journalists and media outlets are exposed to significant joint liability claims.

Key points

  • ▪The court awarded 450,000 NIS in damages to Adv. Efi Naveh.
  • ▪Liability is imposed on Hadas Shteif and Galey Tzahal on a 'joint and several' basis.
  • ▪The ruling allows the plaintiff to collect the full sum from either defendant.
  • ▪The case highlights the boundaries of responsibility between journalists and employers in tort claims.
  • ▪Adherence to the Privacy Protection Law is critical in journalistic work.

The privacy infringement case involving Adv. Efi Naveh has reached a significant legal milestone with the publication of a court decision regarding damage awards. According to reports by 'Globes', journalist Hadas Shteif and the Galey Tzahal radio station are required to pay Adv. Naveh 450,000 NIS in damages, plus additional legal costs. The ruling specifies that liability for the privacy breach is imposed on a 'joint and several' basis. Legally, this means Adv. Naveh may collect the full amount of the awarded damages from either defendant—whether from the journalist herself or the media outlet that employs her. This issue has captured the attention of the legal and media spheres, as it clarifies the boundaries between the personal liability of a journalist and the institutional liability of their employer regarding torts committed in the course of duty.

The current legal discussion focuses on the internal allocation of the payment between Shteif and Galey Tzahal. Generally, in cases of joint liability, defendants may reach internal settlements or the court may establish a division key based on the degree of responsibility attributed to each party according to the evidence presented. This decision follows a prolonged period of legal proceedings that has stirred the public and media sectors in Israel. For the legal community and media professionals, it serves as a significant reminder of the legal consequences arising from violations of the Privacy Protection Law. The case illustrates the complexity of employer-employee relationships within media organizations concerning tort claims related to journalistic work.

Currently, the parties are required to comply with the judicial decision, as it remains to be seen how the payment will be implemented and what internal financial arrangements will be made between the defendants to cover the awarded sum. The case highlights the importance of strict adherence to professional ethics and privacy laws, even within vigorous journalistic reporting, as the financial liability can be substantial and imposed collectively on those involved in the publication and dissemination of information.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile