A significant development has been recorded in the 'Company Games' case, an affair that has stirred public opinion in Israel involving serious allegations of sex offenses and the exploitation of minors. As reported by 'Ice' based on a 'Walla' report, the State has submitted an official notice to the High Court of Justice, stating that the Israel Police will begin a series of investigative completions in the file. The decision was made in response to a petition submitted to the High Court by one of the complainants in the case, represented by Adv.
Amit Manor. The petition was filed against the heads of the law enforcement system and included sharp criticism of how testimonies were previously collected and the decision to refrain from exhausting the investigation of suspicions against those involved. The 'Company Games' case has been linked over the years to allegations of procuring and harming at-risk girls, attributed to the late Danny Biton, father of singer Eyal Golan, and other associates. The current decision for investigative completions comes approximately five months after the State Attorney’s Office ordered, in principle, the reopening of the case following appeals filed by the complainants.
However, the process encountered bureaucratic and legal difficulties, with the Head of the Investigation Division, Assistant Commissioner Boaz Blat, at one point freezing the investigative completions and refusing to authorize the summoning of key suspects. Following intensive dialogue between legal officials, the police retracted the freezing of proceedings and agreed to carry out a substantive part of the required investigative actions. As part of the commitment provided by the State to the High Court, law enforcement authorities pledged to update the court on the findings of the investigation within 45 days, by November 22, 2026.
Following this period, the State Attorney’s Office is expected to formulate a final legal decision on the continued handling of the submitted appeals. For the general public, this represents a significant shift in enforcement policy in a case previously considered closed, with central arguments regarding the conduct of the police and the State Attorney’s Office now subject to re-examination. The developments in the case highlight the importance of judicial review over the decisions of enforcement bodies, especially in cases of high public sensitivity.
The duration of the proceedings and the police decision to conduct investigative completions indicate that the legal issues surrounding the case have not yet reached their conclusion, and that the complainants' legal struggle for justice continues to serve as a central driver for changing official decisions.