24 September 2026ICE – משפט

Carrefour Franchisee Ordered to Pay Damages for Nighttime Noise

The Jerusalem Magistrate's Court has ordered Global Retail, the Carrefour franchisee in Israel, to pay 100,000 NIS to an 86-year-old resident. This follows a decade of severe noise disturbances caused by late-night supply deliveries, in violation of prior agreements and injunctions.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at ICE – משפט

Why it matters

The ruling underscores the responsibility of retail chains for the conduct of their suppliers and clarifies that violating injunctions and quiet-enjoyment agreements can lead to substantial financial damages for private nuisance.

Key points

  • ▪The court ordered the Carrefour franchisee to pay 100,000 NIS in damages for noise pollution.
  • ▪The noise nuisance persisted for over a decade and involved the violation of prior judicial orders.
  • ▪The judge criticized the company for ignoring supply drivers' violations for the sake of profit.
  • ▪The court called for local authorities to increase enforcement of business license conditions.
  • ▪The ruling defines the plaintiff's experience as grounds for a private nuisance claim.

A protracted legal battle spanning 12 years has concluded in the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court with a ruling against Global Retail, the franchisee of the Carrefour supermarket chain in Israel. The case centered on the struggle of an 86-year-old Jerusalem resident living on Reines Street, who had suffered for over a decade from acute nighttime noise pollution caused by supply trucks unloading merchandise at his doorstep.

Judge Orna Sandler-Eitan ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the company to pay 100,000 NIS for emotional distress, in addition to 17,000 NIS in legal expenses. According to a report by ICE, the plaintiff was forced to document hundreds of violations of prior settlement agreements and injunctions intended to regulate delivery hours for the branch, which is located on the ground floor of his building.

During the proceedings, it emerged that delivery drivers continued to operate in the early hours of the morning and even engaged in verbal confrontations with the resident while ignoring established restrictions. Judge Sandler-Eitan issued sharp criticism of the retail chain, noting that the company chose to remain indifferent to its suppliers' violations as long as it did not impact financial profitability.

The court determined that this conduct constitutes a 'private nuisance,' as it significantly and continuously interfered with the plaintiff's reasonable use of his apartment. Furthermore, the judge criticized the role of local authorities, noting that the Jerusalem Municipality should strictly enforce business license conditions.

The message from the ruling is that business conduct detrimental to residents' quality of life is unacceptable, and retail chains have a duty to monitor their supply chain to prevent environmental and personal harm. The ruling serves as a reminder that long-standing legal battles can end in significant recognition of the suffering of residents facing large commercial entities, even when previous attempts at settlement were ignored.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile