9 September 2026גלובס – משפט

High Court Ruling on Regulator Dismissals: New Limits on Ministers

The High Court of Justice has established strict new rules for the dismissal of regulators by government ministers, emphasizing that such actions require objective factual evidence and purely professional justification.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at גלובס – משפט

Why it matters

The ruling imposes a strict evidentiary threshold on ministers seeking to dismiss regulators, thereby strengthening the independence of Israel’s gatekeepers and limiting the political echelon's ability to act on non-professional grounds.

Key points

  • ▪The High Court ruled that dismissing regulators requires a solid, objective evidentiary basis.
  • ▪The process to dismiss Competition Commissioner Adv. Michal Cohen will be handled by the Appointments Committee in an expedited manner.
  • ▪The dismissal process is currently delayed due to election period restrictions preventing the convening of the Appointments Committee.
  • ▪The previous Civil Service Commissioner had previously refused to advance the Minister’s request to dismiss the Competition Commissioner.
  • ▪The justices' decision emphasizes the obligation to rely solely on professional considerations when a minister moves to terminate a tenure.

The High Court of Justice recently issued a landmark ruling regarding the limits of authority for Israeli government ministers to dismiss regulators and senior officials. The discussion centered on the request of the Minister of Economy, Nir Barkat, to terminate the tenure of the Competition Commissioner, Adv. Michal Cohen. According to reports from Globes, the legal background to the case includes a prior decision by the then-Civil Service Commissioner, who summarily rejected the Minister's request to initiate the dismissal process.

In its judicial decision, the Court ruled that the review of the Minister's request will proceed through the Appointments Committee via an expedited process. However, the justices clarified that due to the current election period, the Appointments Committee cannot be convened immediately; therefore, the advancement of the termination process is subject to the limitations applicable during elections. It is important to note that the High Court’s ruling sharpens the standards required of the political echelon when considering the termination of a regulator. The justices, in a majority opinion, held that any action to dismiss a "gatekeeper" must rely on a solid, objective evidentiary basis and professional considerations alone.

This approach is intended to ensure the independence of supervisory bodies and the professionalism of their appointees, even when disagreements arise with the appointed political level. The practical significance for the public and the legal community in Israel is clear: a minister's power to terminate a regulator's tenure is not absolute and is not subject to political discretion alone. This is a legal milestone establishing the ministers' duty to prove that their decisions are based on factual data and relevant considerations, placing a significant limitation on the ability to dismiss officials at these levels without proper professional justification. The ruling strengthens the role of gatekeepers in the public system and grants an additional layer of protection to the professional independence of those serving in various regulatory bodies in Israel.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile