10 September 2026ynet – משפט ופלילים

6.6 Million NIS Lawsuit Filed Over Kiryat Shmona Lynching

The parents and girlfriend of the late Yoel Lehanghal have filed a lawsuit against the State and the youths accused of his attack. The claim alleges that police failures prevented a murder conviction and compromised the investigation, causing significant damages.

Source transparency

This is an original newsroom summary and analysis. The source was not reproduced, and readers can inspect the original publication.

Original publication at ynet – משפט ופלילים

Why it matters

The lawsuit highlights the tort liability of law enforcement agencies in cases of police negligence. The case serves as a benchmark for compensation issues regarding failures in police investigations and their impact on the outcomes for defendants and victims' families.

Key points

  • ▪The parents and girlfriend of Yoel Lehanghal are suing the State and the attackers for 6.6 million NIS.
  • ▪The lawsuit alleges severe police failures at the scene that assisted the attackers.
  • ▪The plaintiffs claim that investigation failures prevented murder convictions for the suspects.
  • ▪The family claims officers failed to secure medical treatment for the victim in real-time.
  • ▪The State Attorney's Office stated they have not yet received the lawsuit.

Nearly four years after the tragic murder of Yoel Lehanghal, who died following a lynching by a group of youths in Kiryat Shmona, his parents and girlfriend have filed a 6. 6 million NIS tort claim in the Central District Court. The lawsuit is directed at the State of Israel and the group of youths charged with the assault. The central cause of action rests on allegations of severe police failures, which the plaintiffs argue prevented the prevention of the murder and obstructed justice for those responsible.

Attorney Rachel Tzinkin, representing the plaintiffs, claims in the statement of claim that police conduct at the scene was fundamentally flawed. According to the allegations, a patrol team that arrived before the murder displayed negative bias toward the victim, failed to prevent the continuation of the attack, and instead protected the local assailants rather than ensuring Lehanghal's safety. The lawsuit details that the officers left the scene, leaving Lehanghal injured, without medical treatment, and without making a genuine effort to locate suspects.

It is further alleged that after the violent event, police actions led to the obstruction of the investigation, allowing suspects to avoid convictions for murder or manslaughter. According to the family, this conduct, previously exposed in media investigations, caused irreversible damage to the parents' lives. The lawsuit emphasizes that while the city's police commander was dismissed following the incident, this does not replace the need for legal accountability and compensation for their damages.

The plaintiffs argue that had the police acted professionally and reasonably, the tragedy could have been prevented. Conversely, it should be noted that these claims are at the initial filing stage and have not yet been adjudicated. In response to media inquiries, the State Attorney's Office stated that the claim has not yet been received in their offices and they will respond on the merits after reviewing the documents.

General information only. This item is not legal advice and does not replace review of the original source.

Back to all legal news

LawFirms.pro

Update or Remove Public Information

LawFirms.pro allows lawyers and the public to submit requests to update, correct, or remove public information for manual review.

Update or Remove Profile